Letter to the editor |
|
Corresponding author: Nicholas M. Muller ( nicholas.muller@student.uq.edu.au ) Academic editor: Georg Stingl
© 2026 Nicholas M. Muller, Samuel X. Tan, Kaitlin Nufer, Katherine Darch, Nicholas van Rooij, Kiarash Khosrotehrani, H. Peter Soyer, Melissa Manahan, Jason Wu.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes, provided that the article is not altered or modified and the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Muller NM, Tan SX, Nufer K, Darch K, van Rooij N, Khosrotehrani K, Soyer HP, Manahan M, Wu J (2026) Diagnosis of a case of scabies infestation with line-field confocal optical coherence tomography. SKINdeep 2: e183007. https://doi.org/10.1553/skindeep.2026.183007
|
We present a case of scabies diagnosed with LC-OCT with a video of the live scan across the volume of the scabietic burrow.
General dermatology, diagnosis, confocal microscopy, scabies, line-field optical coherence tomography
Dear Editor,
Diagnosis of infestation by Sarcoptes scabiei can fox even the experienced dermatologist, particularly in those patients lacking the more classical signs. Our diagnostic armamentarium can often be found lacking with many modalities having poor sensitivity (microscopy of skin scrapings = 56.3% and dermoscopy = 43.5%) [
Full skin examination of a 42-year-old female revealed a widespread, erythematous, papular eruption without specific features in the interdigital web spaces or on the volar aspects of the wrists. Dermatoscopic examination demonstrated a lesion suspicious for a scabietic burrow [Figure
Figure
HPS is a shareholder of MoleMap NZ LTD and e-Derm Consult GmbH and undertakes regular teledermatological reporting for both companies, he is a Medical Consultant for Canfield Scientific Inc. and a Medical Advisor for First Derm. The remaining authors declare that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors declared that no clinical trials were used in the present study.
Informed consent from the humans, donors or donors’ representatives: Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
The authors declared that no experiments on animals were performed for the present study.
The authors declared that no commercially available immortalised human and animal cell lines were used in the present study.
AI was used for correcting spelling and grammar errors.
No funding was reported.
Nicholas M. Muller and Samuel X. Tan contributed equally and are co-lead authors. Conceptualization: JW, MM, NMM, KK. Data curation: NMM, KN. Formal analysis: KD. Funding acquisition: KK. Methodology: KN, SXT. Project administration: KK, JW. Resources: JW, KK. Software: KK. Supervision: HPS, KK, KD, MM, NR, JW. Validation: JW. Visualization: SXT, NMM. Writing – original draft: SXT, NMM. Writing – review and editing: NR, HPS.
Nicholas M. Muller https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6294-4109
Samuel X. Tan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-1378
Kaitlin Nufer https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2813-1518
Katherine Darch https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1191-5655
Kiarash Khosrotehrani https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6406-4076
H. Peter Soyer https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4770-561X
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.
Supplementary figure S1
Data type: mp4
Explanation note: Live line-field confocal optical coherence tomography scan through a scabies burrow, from Figure