Letter to the editor |
|
Corresponding author: Dedee Frances Murrell ( d.murrell@unsw.edu.au ) Academic editor: Peter Wolf
© 2025 Madeleine Stark, Alexis Daniel Lara Rivero, Dedee Frances Murrell.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes, provided that the article is not altered or modified and the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Stark M, Lara Rivero AD, Murrell DF (2025) Photoallergic drug eruption secondary to oral terbinafine prescribed for management of tinea incognita. SKINdeep 1: e162876. https://doi.org/10.1553/skindeep.2025.153393
|
Terbinafine is an allylamine antifungal commonly prescribed either topically or orally to treat dermatophyte infections. This case presents a photoallergic drug reaction secondary to oral terbinafine that may have been exacerbated by the accompanying topical terbinafine.
A 68-year-old woman was prescribed oral terbinafine in addition to topical terbinafine for a widespread intensely pruritic tinea incognita infection which had been mistakenly treated with topical corticosteroids for a prolonged duration. She had been applying topical terbinafine to affected areas for two weeks with symptomatic improvement noted over her abdomen and groin but minimal improvement over her arms, legs and chest. Routine bloods were reviewed and oral terbinafine was prescribed additionally in light of the widespread nature of her infection. Her only other regular medication was oral perindopril arginine for management of hypertension which she has been taking for approximately five years. Over the next seven days, she felt increasingly unwell, with fatigue and nausea. She also began to develop worsening erythema, oedema and eventually cutaneous pain over her upper and lower limbs and décolletage which had been treated with topical terbinafine. She also developed this rash over areas not exposed to topical terbinafine including the dorsal hands and her neck. Her face was unaffected. She had continued to swim outdoors each day wearing a swimsuit which covered her from mid upper arm to mid-thigh. She did not report any fevers, any mucosal involvement or any blistering. She was reviewed and found to have a violaceous and erythematous finely scaled rash with associated oedema in a clear photo-exposed distribution, with sparing on the regions covered by her swimsuit (Fig.
There have been sporadic case reports of terbinafine precipitating photosensitive skin rashes, including systemic lupus erythematosus [
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The authors declared that no clinical trials were used in the present study.
The authors declared that no experiments on humans or human tissues were performed for the present study.
Informed consent from the humans, donors or donors’ representatives: A signed informed consent document has been obtained from the person on whom this case report has been written. This document is currently kept at Premier Specialists, Sydney, Australia.
The authors declared that no experiments on animals were performed for the present study.
The authors declared that no commercially available immortalised human and animal cell lines were used in the present study.
No use of AI was reported.
No funding was reported.
MS, ALR and DFM reviewed the patient and formulated diagnosis and management, MS wrote the manuscript, ALR and DFM reviewed and edited the manuscript. Writing – Original draft: MS. Writing – Review and Editing: ALR and DFM Supervision: ALR and DFM.
Madeleine Stark https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7186-082X
Alexis Daniel Lara Rivero https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5596-7900
Dedee Frances Murrell https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2971-0199
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.